Tag Archives: Napster

Spotify VS iTunes: What We Can Learn

I am a music junkie. I dig a very complex (read: weird) mix of ambient (like Mark Dwane), classic rock (like Van Halen), yacht rock (like America), retro synth instrumentals (yes, there is such a genre – check out Mitch Murder), smooth jazz (no I’m not kidding – check out the new set from Threestyle) and really, really heavy hardcore metal (still not kidding, Killswitch Engage is one of my favorites). Eclectic does not begin to define my taste in music. As a result, the promise of using technology to create my very own custom “radio stations” (a la playlists) intrigued me from the get go. I was a very early adopter of the iTunes platform.

Over the years, I have given Apple thousands of dollars in exchange for music. I own a lot of songs from a lot of artists and even though Apple’s music purchases are now technically DRM-free, sorting out your new songs and your old, DRM-addled songs can be a real headache. In fact, of all the software that Apple has ever developed, iTunes may be the most derided. It isn’t good at being portable (the word synching makes even the most ardent Apple supporter cringe and desperately try to change the subject), flexible or usable. In fact, for being a company that invented Mac OS, the most user-friendly interface of all time (just ask Bill Gates), it’s strange that Apple’s user interface for iTunes has always been a rickety, old-fashioned mess. Acquiring Beats a few years ago and launching Apple Music didn’t do much to change this (in fact, I was fascinated by how quickly Apple managed to give away any cachet that Beats once had).

Which is why even though Apple continues to rule the world when it comes to smartphones and tablets, it is getting murdered in the world of streaming music. The guilty party? Spotify, a Swedish streaming service that started in 2006 and crossed the ocean in 2011. On paper, Spotify looks a bit like the love child of Pandora and iTunes. It has playlists and radio stations and curation and – what a minute, doesn’t EVERY streaming service have those? Even old scrubs like Rhapsody/Napster and young scrubs like Bandcamp? Yep. Let me be the first to say this on the internet – all music streaming services are pretty much the same.

Pretty much. I love the fact that Spotify is a living, breathing example of a successful company that didn’t really invent anything, or even innovate anything. They just figured out how to do it better. Now that I use Spotify, I can appreciate why it has been so easy to adopt: it is really, really easy to use. It keeps just enough of the old “iTunes DNA” to give users a comfortable starting point, then makes everything smoother, faster, easier, more intuitive and better. Searches return helpful, accurate search results (one of my all time pet peeves from iTunes). Dragging and dropping is almost perfect (no more “uh oh – where did that song just go?” moments), and managing your library is a breeze (you can even bring in playlists from iTunes). Plus, Spotify doesn’t care if it is on my iPhone or my Mac at work or my PC at home or my smart TV or my gaming systems. It plays the same everywhere.

What a difference your user experience (UX) can make. That Earth Crisis song I listen to sounds exactly the same on both Spotify and iTunes, it’s just easier to listen to on Spotify. And that’s why I don’t launch iTunes very much anymore. (Plus, the fact that Taylor Swift has left Spotify actually wins the service big points with me – how can a 26-year-old sound so much like such an old lady when it comes to music licensing? “Where’s my money you whipper snappers?”).

How old is the UX on your website or app? Nowadays, keeping your user experience up to date is almost as important as keeping your code up to date (and in some cases, more important). Can users find information easily? Can they use your site on any platform? If your site or app is not easy to use, users will go someplace that is. Just ask Apple.

Coding + Branding = Winning

Newsflash: Napster has once again risen from the grave. Rhapsody – you know, that music service that old people use with their dial-up modems – recently announced that it was going to adopt the Napster name and DJ/cat logo for its service. Will it allow illegal file sharing? Will the guys from Metallica yell “you rotten kids stop listening to our music and get off our lawn” from the rocking chairs on their porch? Will it take the internet by storm?

Nope. It will still be an also-ran music service that gets absolutely pummeled by more modern services like Spotify and Pandora and iHeart Radio. In fact Rhapsody’s product isn’t even what makes this a compelling story. What makes it newsworthy is that 17 or so years after the real Napster went online, its brand is still around, even though its code, content and business model have changed repeatedly and drastically (Best Buy even owned the name for a few years, though nobody seemed to notice).

Does that mean that coding is irrelevant? Far from it. The only reason that Napster became a household word is because its programming (and the premise behind it) was fairly revolutionary. It took peer-to-peer sharing to another level.

But it wouldn’t still be around today if it was only the code. After all, a court order took the code offline a really long time ago. No, success on the internet depends on equal parts brains and charisma. Napster had a good product, a memorable logo, an interesting spokesperson (founder Sean Parker) and great timing. The alchemical result of mixing those ingredients was magic.

Here at {code} Roadies, our code and the content it delivers are written to make your designs look great, your ideas come to life and your brand stand out. If we do our job right, your branding efforts transcend your website. The code is critical – but it’s only the beginning. I’d like to think that this big picture thinking is what sets {code} Roadies apart.